A key question posed by the Interim Report of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry is why the legal requirement that financial services are provided "efficiently, honestly and fairly" was not enough to prevent some of the conduct which has been revealed.
The Commission's view is the requirement to provide financial services "efficiently, honestly and fairly" means the enterprise must do more than not break the law; it must also seek to do "the right thing". Here, partner Selina Nutley explains how this standard means more than mere compliance with the law.
The Letters Patent establishing the Commission state:
All Australians have the right to be treated honestly and fairly in their dealings with banking, superannuation and financial services providers. The highest standards of conduct are critical to the good governance and corporate culture of those providers.
The courts have explained what they believe "efficiently, honestly and fairly" means in a generic sense as follows:
It is not necessary for another provision to be breached to fall foul of the "efficiently, honestly and fairly" standard. The statutory standard itself is the source of the obligation.
Generally, it seems the industry has taken a "do no harm" approach to compliance with this provision, as opposed to 'do what is best". This minimalistic approach, coupled with compliance being seen as a "cost of business", rather than an integral part of the strategy of any financial services business, means the law has not been effective in creating a culture of efficiency, honesty and fairness.
The Commission queries whether ASIC has been tough enough on pursuing civil action for breaches of this and other provisions. For example, much has been made of the fact ASIC has never prosecuted any breach of section 912D of the Corporations Act which requires a breach report to be made as soon as practicable or within 10 business days.
We are often involved in the deliberations of our clients about whether something is a breach, whether it is significant, and when to report. These deliberations are difficult when the breach is proposed to be of the "efficiently, honestly and fairly" standard. We are asked what attitude ASIC will take to a particular breach. Our advice has consistently been it is best to lodge the report when there is uncertainty. This facilitates the proper functioning of the entire system.
The Commission emphasises the use of the word "all" in the section to draw our attention to the fact everything that could be done to provide the financial services efficiently, honestly and fairly must be done. This requirement is highlighted in Regulatory Guide 256 Client review and remediation conducted by advice licensees. There, ASIC states a financial services licensee's general obligation to provide the services efficiently, honestly and fairly requires the licensee to "take responsibility" for the consequences of their actions if things go wrong and clients suffer loss or detriment.
The clear message from the Report is that "efficiently, honestly and fairly" requires entities to behave in a way that seeks to do the right thing which means something more than mere compliance with the law.